School Context Comparator

Exam results say a lot about a school's pupils, not just its teaching. A school where many children are disadvantaged or have special educational needs will usually have lower results, even if it's doing a great job. This compares each school with what you'd expect from the pupils it teaches.

Primary and junior schools in Kingston upon Hull, City of: SATs results in context

% meeting the expected standard, average of the three years to 2024/25. Each numbered dot is a school (see the table below). Above the line means better results than you'd expect from its pupils; the shaded strip is "about what you'd expect".

  • Better than expected
  • About as expected
  • Below expected

The faint grey dots behind are every other school in England, for comparison.

Green ring: low teacher turnover – among the quarter of similar schools in England where teachers are most likely to stay (three-year average).

3030404050506060707080809090Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected % (from the school's pupils)Actual % meeting the expected standard1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
3030404050506060707080809090Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected %Actual % meeting the expected standard1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768

Loading stats for 13,485 schools across England…

Did you know? In a class of 30, one child moves a school's SATs percentage by more than 3 points - which is why we use a three-year average. How this works

How each school compares

# School Compared with what you'd expect Actual Expected Gap Disadvantaged SEN EAL Pupils(3 years) Teacher turnover(a year)
1 Wansbeck Primary School Well above 74% 48% +26.4 73% 35% 0% 91 14%above average
2 Bude Park Primary School Well above 81% 57% +24.4 53% 21% 12% 95 25%
3 Highlands Primary School Well above 79% 55% +24.2 67% 14% 10% 164 5%low
4 Christopher Pickering Primary School Well above 79% 57% +22.4 48% 27% 15% 184 13%below average
5 Maybury Primary School Well above 77% 55% +21.7 63% 20% 23% 91 0%low
6 Clifton Primary School Well above 77% 56% +20.8 67% 25% 65% 137 11%below average
7 Spring Cottage Primary School Well above 84% 63% +20.7 20% 23% 3% 184 7%low
8 Neasden Primary School Well above 80% 60% +20.4 48% 12% 6% 132 6%low
9 Bricknell Primary School Well above 87% 67% +19.8 14% 14% 6% 268 16%above average
10 Collingwood Primary School Well above 76% 58% +18.0 58% 21% 47% 117 12%below average
11 The Parks Primary Academy Well above 63% 45% +18.0 80% 44% 18% 136 13%below average
12 Marfleet Primary Academy Well above 72% 54% +17.9 54% 29% 8% 79 28%
13 Kingswood Parks Primary School Well above 85% 67% +17.6 12% 15% 6% 258 14%above average
14 Estcourt Primary Academy Well above 78% 61% +16.9 37% 21% 21% 122 24%high
15 Craven Primary Academy Well above 79% 62% +16.6 33% 19% 19% 83 16%
16 Lift Hall Road Well above 67% 51% +16.0 64% 34% 14% 138 23%high
17 Parkstone Primary School Well above 79% 63% +15.7 33% 12% 8% 153 6%low
18 Rokeby Park Primary School Well above 65% 49% +15.6 57% 43% 0% 77 13%
19 Lift Green Way Well above 69% 54% +15.2 64% 28% 33% 180 11%below average
20 Eastfield Primary School Well above 78% 63% +14.9 25% 22% 13% 269 17%above average
21 St Nicholas Primary School Well above 78% 64% +13.9 26% 22% 30% 85 23%
22 Thorpepark Academy Well above 63% 50% +13.3 80% 24% 15% 200 15%above average
23 Wold Academy Well above 72% 59% +12.9 27% 34% 5% 191 17%above average
24 Adelaide Primary School Well above 67% 54% +12.6 64% 34% 61% 173 15%above average
25 East Park Primary School Above 77% 66% +10.9 10% 22% 5% 179 8%low
26 Appleton Primary School Above 63% 53% +10.4 58% 33% 13% 120 10%low
27 Westcott Primary School Above 72% 62% +10.4 29% 24% 12% 140 23%high
28 Priory Primary School Above 68% 58% +10.2 43% 24% 6% 169 9%low
29 Ainthorpe Primary School Above 68% 58% +10.0 45% 25% 18% 137 9%low
30 Thanet Primary School Above 64% 55% +8.9 56% 23% 8% 168 9%low
31 Mersey Primary Academy Above 72% 63% +8.8 40% 10% 23% 90 11%
32 Biggin Hill Primary School Above 63% 55% +8.0 58% 22% 9% 266 7%low
33 Longhill Primary School Above 63% 55% +7.6 65% 17% 21% 164 13%below average
34 Stoneferry Primary School Above 66% 59% +7.1 33% 29% 4% 67 27%
35 Buckingham Primary Academy Above 63% 57% +6.2 43% 32% 18% 100 3%low
36 St James' Church of England Academy Above 64% 58% +6.1 50% 17% 7% 89 9%
37 Broadacre Primary School Above 66% 62% +4.5 36% 17% 10% 208 13%below average
38 Dorchester Primary School As expected 58% 54% +4.5 60% 24% 2% 133 12%below average
39 Pearson Primary School As expected 63% 59% +4.2 63% 22% 78% 90 12%below average
40 Sutton Park Primary School As expected 69% 65% +4.1 25% 12% 4% 157 15%above average
41 Woodland Primary School As expected 57% 53% +4.0 71% 21% 21% 84 5%
42 Alderman Cogan's Church of England Primary Academy As expected 70% 66% +3.6 17% 15% 8% 176 22%high
43 Stockwell Academy As expected 59% 56% +3.2 52% 26% 14% 147 9%low
44 Bellfield Primary School As expected 65% 62% +2.8 35% 13% 3% 93 18%
45 Cleeve Primary School As expected 51% 49% +1.9 76% 31% 17% 168 15%above average
46 St Richard's VC Academy As expected 58% 58% +0.5 47% 28% 28% 148 4%low
47 Lift Newington As expected 61% 61% +0.2 45% 20% 40% 161 12%below average
48 St Mary Queen of Martyrs VC Academy As expected 60% 60% −0.4 33% 23% 5% 127 15%above average
49 Endsleigh Holy Child VC Academy As expected 67% 68% −0.5 16% 16% 23% 130 19%above average
50 Chiltern Primary School As expected 58% 59% −1.2 49% 26% 51% 169 11%below average
51 Griffin Primary School As expected 56% 57% −1.3 47% 22% 5% 175 20%high
52 Southcoates Primary Academy As expected 54% 57% −2.6 56% 24% 31% 142 10%below average
53 Endike Academy As expected 51% 54% −3.2 59% 27% 19% 177 16%above average
54 Thoresby Primary School As expected 63% 66% −3.3 26% 18% 46% 225 11%below average
55 Victoria Dock Primary School As expected 63% 67% −3.7 12% 21% 17% 114 15%above average
56 Francis Askew Primary School As expected 53% 58% −4.5 57% 18% 27% 165 15%above average
57 Ings Primary School Below 49% 55% −5.6 44% 36% 5% 114 26%high
58 Mountbatten Primary School Below 50% 56% −6.0 57% 17% 3% 122 12%below average
59 St George's Primary School Below 60% 67% −6.5 38% 7% 52% 87 7%low
60 St Vincent's Voluntary Catholic Academy Below 54% 62% −8.0 33% 37% 74% 85 6%low
61 Oldfleet Primary School Below 38% 49% −11.4 73% 33% 18% 139 13%below average
62 Newland St John's Church of England Academy Well below 58% 71% −12.6 13% 13% 47% 111 8%low
63 Paisley Primary School Well below 49% 62% −12.8 42% 16% 30% 134 16%above average
64 St Anthony's Voluntary Catholic Academy Well below 46% 60% −13.5 55% 10% 21% 90 17%
65 Sidmouth Primary School Well below 53% 68% −15.3 27% 10% 51% 156 10%below average
66 Wheeler Primary School Well below 49% 65% −16.1 34% 18% 57% 171 16%above average
67 Stepney Primary School Well below 40% 58% −18.0 45% 39% 65% 85 0%
68 St Charles Voluntary Catholic Academy Well below 42% 64% −22.0 36% 24% 68% 76 19%

Results are the average of the last three Year 6 groups, which is steadier than a single year. Pupil percentages are for the latest Year 6. Disadvantaged: eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, or looked after by the council. SEN: special educational needs (SEN support or an EHC plan). EAL: English as an additional language.

How this works

We looked at every comparable state primary and junior school in England (14,315 schools) to see how SATs results usually change with the make-up of a year group. On average:

  • For every 10 more disadvantaged pupils in every 100, the share meeting the expected standard is about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with SEN in every 100, it's about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with English as an additional language in every 100, it's about 0.7 percentage points higher. Pupils learning English often catch up quickly.

From those, each school gets an expected result for its own pupils, which we compare with its actual result. Primary year groups are small – in a class of 30, one child moves the percentage by more than 3 points – so we use the three-year average and allow for each school's own pupil numbers: a small school needs a bigger gap before we call it above or below what you'd expect.

What we found: schools where teachers stay

We put every primary and junior school's result-against-expected next to its teacher turnover – the share of its teachers who moved to another school or left state schools each year, averaged over three years (DfE school workforce census). Across 8,274 schools in England, split into four equal groups by turnover:

Teacher turnoverTypical turnoverResults vs expectedDid better than expected
Lowest turnover 7% a year +1.8 pts 40%
Lower-middle 12% a year +1.2 pts 37%
Upper-middle 17% a year +0.7 pts 36%
Highest turnover 26% a year −1.2 pts 32%

The pattern is the same as for secondary schools but weaker, and most of the difference is in the quarter of schools where teachers leave most often (−1.2 percentage points, against +1.8 for the lowest-turnover quarter). Primary staffs are small and SATs results move around from year to year, which blurs the picture.

A link isn't proof that one causes the other: losing teachers may hold results back, and a school that's struggling for other reasons (leadership, for example) may also lose more teachers. Nationally, turnover is fairly steady from year to year and teachers who move are replaced – but between schools it varies a lot, from under one teacher in ten a year to more than one in five. The green rings on the chart mark the lowest-turnover quarter.

What it can't tell you

  • These three things explain only about 18% of the differences between schools. Much of what makes a school stronger or weaker, and much about its pupils, isn't captured by any published figure.
  • Even averaged over three years, small schools' results move around a lot, so treat close calls as roughly equal.
  • It isn't an excuse for lower results. It shows how a school does compared with schools teaching similar pupils, so you can compare more fairly.
  • We deliberately don't adjust for attendance or exclusions: those are partly down to the school itself.

Source: Department for Education, Key Stage 2 performance data (2024/25). Calculated by The School Companion.