School Context Comparator

Exam results say a lot about a school's pupils, not just its teaching. A school where many children are disadvantaged or have special educational needs will usually have lower results, even if it's doing a great job. This compares each school with what you'd expect from the pupils it teaches.

Primary and junior schools in Vale of White Horse: SATs results in context

% meeting the expected standard, average of the three years to 2024/25. Each numbered dot is a school (see the table below). Above the line means better results than you'd expect from its pupils; the shaded strip is "about what you'd expect".

  • Better than expected
  • About as expected
  • Below expected

The faint grey dots behind are every other school in England, for comparison.

Green ring: low teacher turnover – among the quarter of similar schools in England where teachers are most likely to stay (three-year average).

3030404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected % (from the school's pupils)Actual % meeting the expected standard123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445
3030404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected %Actual % meeting the expected standard123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445

Loading stats for 13,485 schools across England…

Did you know? In a class of 30, one child moves a school's SATs percentage by more than 3 points - which is why we use a three-year average. How this works

How each school compares

# School Compared with what you'd expect Actual Expected Gap Disadvantaged SEN EAL Pupils(3 years) Teacher turnover(a year)
1 Buckland Church of England Primary School Well above 91% 71% +20.4 7% 7% 7% 46 14%
2 Thomas Reade Primary School Above 74% 64% +10.4 27% 20% 20% 88 10%
3 Longcot and Fernham Church of England Primary School Above 75% 66% +8.9 17% 17% 11% 59 41%
4 Harwell Primary School Above 66% 58% +8.3 27% 42% 12% 86 20%
5 North Hinksey Church of England Primary School Above 75% 68% +7.1 10% 13% 0% 92 23%
6 Rush Common School Above 77% 70% +7.0 2% 17% 15% 166 15%above average
7 St Amand's Catholic Primary School Above 70% 65% +5.2 11% 28% 11% 64 11%
8 Carswell Community Primary School As expected 71% 67% +4.0 14% 17% 14% 83 16%above average
9 Caldecott Primary School As expected 59% 55% +3.7 36% 44% 15% 165 15%above average
10 Wantage Church of England Primary School As expected 69% 66% +3.3 20% 17% 15% 180 12%below average
11 Didcot Primary Academy As expected 71% 68% +2.8 13% 23% 47% 180 17%above average
12 Cumnor Church of England School (Voluntary Controlled) As expected 70% 68% +1.9 3% 23% 13% 91 6%low
13 Millbrook Primary School As expected 65% 63% +1.9 23% 21% 3% 170 23%high
14 St Nicolas Church of England Primary School, Abingdon As expected 68% 67% +1.1 13% 16% 5% 181 13%below average
15 St Swithun's CofE Primary School As expected 67% 66% +0.9 15% 20% 14% 177 11%below average
16 The Ridgeway Church of England (C) Primary School As expected 56% 56% −0.1 27% 45% 0% 36 30%
17 The Elms Primary School As expected 58% 58% −0.4 32% 33% 8% 268 26%high
18 Shrivenham Church of England School As expected 59% 60% −1.0 28% 28% 0% 81 16%above average
19 Chilton County Primary School As expected 65% 68% −2.6 9% 18% 9% 123 13%below average
20 Stockham Primary School As expected 54% 57% −2.6 33% 40% 10% 91 44%
21 Wootton St Peter's Church of England Primary School As expected 68% 72% −3.6 10% 10% 40% 37 17%
22 John Blandy Primary School As expected 61% 65% −4.0 13% 23% 3% 89 22%high
23 Sutton Courtenay Church of England Primary School Below 64% 69% −5.1 15% 11% 26% 76 36%high
24 The Hendreds Church of England School Below 59% 65% −5.6 23% 18% 14% 64 10%
25 Ashbury With Compton Beauchamp Church of England Primary School Below 55% 62% −6.7 33% 20% 13% 38 24%
26 Radley Church of England Primary School Below 63% 71% −7.6 0% 17% 17% 41 22%
27 Long Furlong Primary School Below 60% 68% −7.7 10% 20% 20% 89 18%
28 St Blaise CofE Primary School Below 57% 65% −7.8 19% 19% 6% 46 10%
29 Appleton Church of England (A) Primary School Below 62% 70% −8.1 5% 15% 20% 73 25%
30 Charlton Primary School Below 58% 67% −9.1 8% 20% 5% 177 11%below average
31 St James Church of England Primary School, Hanney Below 48% 59% −10.5 24% 41% 10% 75 23%
32 Dunmore Primary School Below 52% 63% −10.9 22% 25% 10% 170 16%above average
33 Blewbury Church of England Primary School Below 41% 53% −11.5 45% 45% 9% 54 18%
34 Drayton Community Primary School Well below 52% 64% −12.1 17% 23% 3% 88 39%
35 Thameside Primary School Well below 38% 51% −12.6 41% 56% 7% 71 11%
36 Stanford In the Vale CofE Primary School Well below 52% 66% −13.8 18% 14% 0% 85 17%
37 St Edmund's Catholic Primary School Well below 49% 64% −14.5 19% 27% 15% 70 38%
38 Watchfield Primary School Well below 45% 60% −15.4 30% 28% 12% 123 11%below average
39 Uffington Church of England Primary School Well below 49% 65% −16.4 0% 33% 0% 41 18%
40 Grove Church of England School Well below 47% 65% −18.1 21% 18% 14% 85 16%
41 Dry Sandford Primary School Well below 53% 71% −18.3 0% 13% 13% 36 17%
42 St Nicholas CofE Primary School Well below 48% 67% −18.9 7% 20% 0% 42 24%
43 Marcham Church of England (Voluntary Controlled) Primary School Well below 43% 63% −19.9 25% 21% 7% 75 25%high
44 Botley School Well below 44% 68% −24.2 13% 19% 34% 123 29%high
45 Shellingford Church of England (Voluntary Aided) School Well below 45% 70% −24.6 7% 13% 13% 42 12%

Results are the average of the last three Year 6 groups, which is steadier than a single year. Pupil percentages are for the latest Year 6. Disadvantaged: eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, or looked after by the council. SEN: special educational needs (SEN support or an EHC plan). EAL: English as an additional language.

Not compared

How this works

We looked at every comparable state primary and junior school in England (14,315 schools) to see how SATs results usually change with the make-up of a year group. On average:

  • For every 10 more disadvantaged pupils in every 100, the share meeting the expected standard is about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with SEN in every 100, it's about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with English as an additional language in every 100, it's about 0.7 percentage points higher. Pupils learning English often catch up quickly.

From those, each school gets an expected result for its own pupils, which we compare with its actual result. Primary year groups are small – in a class of 30, one child moves the percentage by more than 3 points – so we use the three-year average and allow for each school's own pupil numbers: a small school needs a bigger gap before we call it above or below what you'd expect.

What we found: schools where teachers stay

We put every primary and junior school's result-against-expected next to its teacher turnover – the share of its teachers who moved to another school or left state schools each year, averaged over three years (DfE school workforce census). Across 8,274 schools in England, split into four equal groups by turnover:

Teacher turnoverTypical turnoverResults vs expectedDid better than expected
Lowest turnover 7% a year +1.8 pts 40%
Lower-middle 12% a year +1.2 pts 37%
Upper-middle 17% a year +0.7 pts 36%
Highest turnover 26% a year −1.2 pts 32%

The pattern is the same as for secondary schools but weaker, and most of the difference is in the quarter of schools where teachers leave most often (−1.2 percentage points, against +1.8 for the lowest-turnover quarter). Primary staffs are small and SATs results move around from year to year, which blurs the picture.

A link isn't proof that one causes the other: losing teachers may hold results back, and a school that's struggling for other reasons (leadership, for example) may also lose more teachers. Nationally, turnover is fairly steady from year to year and teachers who move are replaced – but between schools it varies a lot, from under one teacher in ten a year to more than one in five. The green rings on the chart mark the lowest-turnover quarter.

What it can't tell you

  • These three things explain only about 18% of the differences between schools. Much of what makes a school stronger or weaker, and much about its pupils, isn't captured by any published figure.
  • Even averaged over three years, small schools' results move around a lot, so treat close calls as roughly equal.
  • It isn't an excuse for lower results. It shows how a school does compared with schools teaching similar pupils, so you can compare more fairly.
  • We deliberately don't adjust for attendance or exclusions: those are partly down to the school itself.

Source: Department for Education, Key Stage 2 performance data (2024/25). Calculated by The School Companion.