School Context Comparator

Exam results say a lot about a school's pupils, not just its teaching. A school where many children are disadvantaged or have special educational needs will usually have lower results, even if it's doing a great job. This compares each school with what you'd expect from the pupils it teaches.

Primary and junior schools in Bracknell Forest: SATs results in context

% meeting the expected standard, average of the three years to 2024/25. Each numbered dot is a school (see the table below). Above the line means better results than you'd expect from its pupils; the shaded strip is "about what you'd expect".

  • Better than expected
  • About as expected
  • Below expected

The faint grey dots behind are every other school in England, for comparison.

Outlined in black: the school you compared (marked "Compared" in the table).

Green ring: low teacher turnover – among the quarter of similar schools in England where teachers are most likely to stay (three-year average).

404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected % (from the school's pupils)Actual % meeting the expected standard12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected %Actual % meeting the expected standard12345678910111213141516171819202122232425

Loading stats for 13,485 schools across England…

Did you know? In a class of 30, one child moves a school's SATs percentage by more than 3 points - which is why we use a three-year average. How this works

How each school compares

# School Compared with what you'd expect Actual Expected Gap Disadvantaged SEN EAL Pupils(3 years) Teacher turnover(a year)
1 Great Hollands Primary School Well above 80% 51% +29.4 48% 52% 17% 132 8%low
2 Crowthorne Church of England Primary School Compared Well above 91% 68% +23.3 7% 20% 10% 90 15%
3 St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, Bracknell Well above 87% 71% +15.7 0% 20% 37% 89 2%
4 St Michael's Church of England Primary School, Sandhurst Well above 84% 70% +13.7 3% 10% 0% 85 20%
5 Uplands Primary School and Nursery Above 80% 69% +10.6 3% 20% 20% 90 14%
6 Whitegrove Primary School As expected 74% 70% +4.4 2% 17% 10% 179 17%above average
7 Cranbourne Primary School As expected 64% 62% +2.5 16% 36% 8% 81 12%
8 Crown Wood Primary School As expected 64% 62% +1.9 21% 32% 19% 237 9%low
9 Ascot Heath Primary School As expected 69% 70% −0.7 9% 9% 7% 175 20%high
10 Jennett's Park CofE Primary School As expected 67% 68% −0.9 13% 16% 20% 169 17%above average
11 Wildmoor Heath School As expected 68% 70% −2.0 3% 14% 9% 103 23%
12 Binfield Church of England Primary School As expected 69% 72% −2.7 7% 7% 22% 177 14%above average
13 New Scotland Hill Primary School As expected 61% 65% −3.6 17% 23% 10% 90 7%low
14 Warfield Church of England Primary School As expected 66% 70% −3.6 5% 15% 13% 180 9%low
15 College Town Primary School As expected 63% 67% −4.0 8% 21% 8% 213 16%above average
16 Fox Hill Primary School Below 57% 65% −7.7 28% 17% 28% 86 22%high
17 Birch Hill Primary School and Nursery Below 56% 64% −8.0 16% 27% 13% 167 31%
18 Winkfield St Mary's CofE Primary School Below 60% 71% −10.5 11% 7% 19% 86 20%
19 St Margaret Clitherow Catholic Primary School, Bracknell Below 57% 68% −10.6 9% 31% 53% 91 14%
20 The Pines School Well below 50% 62% −12.2 29% 23% 17% 156 19%above average
21 Wildridings Primary School Well below 55% 67% −12.3 13% 20% 24% 173 15%above average
22 St Michael's Easthampstead Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School Well below 49% 62% −12.7 24% 28% 10% 84 26%high
23 Holly Spring Primary School Well below 48% 63% −14.8 23% 28% 22% 257 15%above average
24 Sandy Lane Primary School Well below 48% 67% −18.5 21% 19% 36% 210 26%high
25 Harmans Water Primary School Well below 44% 63% −19.4 17% 27% 8% 197 20%above average

Results are the average of the last three Year 6 groups, which is steadier than a single year. Pupil percentages are for the latest Year 6. Disadvantaged: eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, or looked after by the council. SEN: special educational needs (SEN support or an EHC plan). EAL: English as an additional language.

How this works

We looked at every comparable state primary and junior school in England (14,315 schools) to see how SATs results usually change with the make-up of a year group. On average:

  • For every 10 more disadvantaged pupils in every 100, the share meeting the expected standard is about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with SEN in every 100, it's about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with English as an additional language in every 100, it's about 0.7 percentage points higher. Pupils learning English often catch up quickly.

From those, each school gets an expected result for its own pupils, which we compare with its actual result. Primary year groups are small – in a class of 30, one child moves the percentage by more than 3 points – so we use the three-year average and allow for each school's own pupil numbers: a small school needs a bigger gap before we call it above or below what you'd expect.

What we found: schools where teachers stay

We put every primary and junior school's result-against-expected next to its teacher turnover – the share of its teachers who moved to another school or left state schools each year, averaged over three years (DfE school workforce census). Across 8,274 schools in England, split into four equal groups by turnover:

Teacher turnoverTypical turnoverResults vs expectedDid better than expected
Lowest turnover 7% a year +1.8 pts 40%
Lower-middle 12% a year +1.2 pts 37%
Upper-middle 17% a year +0.7 pts 36%
Highest turnover 26% a year −1.2 pts 32%

The pattern is the same as for secondary schools but weaker, and most of the difference is in the quarter of schools where teachers leave most often (−1.2 percentage points, against +1.8 for the lowest-turnover quarter). Primary staffs are small and SATs results move around from year to year, which blurs the picture.

A link isn't proof that one causes the other: losing teachers may hold results back, and a school that's struggling for other reasons (leadership, for example) may also lose more teachers. Nationally, turnover is fairly steady from year to year and teachers who move are replaced – but between schools it varies a lot, from under one teacher in ten a year to more than one in five. The green rings on the chart mark the lowest-turnover quarter.

What it can't tell you

  • These three things explain only about 18% of the differences between schools. Much of what makes a school stronger or weaker, and much about its pupils, isn't captured by any published figure.
  • Even averaged over three years, small schools' results move around a lot, so treat close calls as roughly equal.
  • It isn't an excuse for lower results. It shows how a school does compared with schools teaching similar pupils, so you can compare more fairly.
  • We deliberately don't adjust for attendance or exclusions: those are partly down to the school itself.

Source: Department for Education, Key Stage 2 performance data (2024/25). Calculated by The School Companion.