School Context Comparator

Exam results say a lot about a school's pupils, not just its teaching. A school where many children are disadvantaged or have special educational needs will usually have lower results, even if it's doing a great job. This compares each school with what you'd expect from the pupils it teaches.

Primary and junior schools in Stockport: SATs results in context

% meeting the expected standard, average of the three years to 2024/25. Each numbered dot is a school (see the table below). Above the line means better results than you'd expect from its pupils; the shaded strip is "about what you'd expect".

  • Better than expected
  • About as expected
  • Below expected

The faint grey dots behind are every other school in England, for comparison.

Outlined in black: the school you compared (marked "Compared" in the table).

Green ring: low teacher turnover – among the quarter of similar schools in England where teachers are most likely to stay (three-year average).

3030404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected % (from the school's pupils)Actual % meeting the expected standard1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768
3030404050506060707080809090100100Better than expectedBelow expectedExpected %Actual % meeting the expected standard1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768

Loading stats for 13,485 schools across England…

Did you know? In a class of 30, one child moves a school's SATs percentage by more than 3 points - which is why we use a three-year average. How this works

How each school compares

# School Compared with what you'd expect Actual Expected Gap Disadvantaged SEN EAL Pupils(3 years) Teacher turnover(a year)
1 Gatley Primary School Well above 94% 67% +26.6 17% 15% 22% 179 9%low
2 Bredbury Green Primary School Well above 78% 53% +25.4 63% 28% 13% 99 15%above average
3 St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary School, Reddish, a Voluntary Academy Well above 83% 59% +24.5 45% 20% 8% 188 29%
4 Bradshaw Hall Primary School Well above 86% 64% +22.0 23% 18% 5% 181 4%low
5 Torkington Primary School Well above 87% 67% +19.7 14% 14% 7% 85 3%
6 Tithe Barn Primary School Compared Well above 81% 68% +13.2 6% 23% 19% 88 9%low
7 St Peter's Catholic Primary School Well above 80% 68% +12.1 17% 10% 13% 89 10%low
8 Great Moor Junior School Above 79% 68% +10.7 16% 10% 14% 232 11%below average
9 Lum Head Primary School Above 76% 66% +10.1 26% 20% 48% 137 13%below average
10 Norbury Hall Primary School Above 79% 69% +9.7 5% 13% 3% 179 13%
11 Thorn Grove Primary School Above 77% 68% +9.4 21% 10% 21% 95 10%below average
12 Cheadle Catholic Junior School Above 77% 68% +8.8 9% 16% 11% 269 5%low
13 Oak Tree Primary School Above 77% 68% +8.8 11% 16% 17% 269 9%low
14 Ladybrook Primary School Above 80% 72% +8.4 3% 10% 17% 89 15%above average
15 Ludworth Primary School Above 75% 67% +8.3 13% 15% 0% 134 12%below average
16 St John's Church of England Primary School Above 78% 70% +7.9 6% 16% 26% 91 20%above average
17 Didsbury Road Primary School Above 76% 68% +7.6 7% 16% 7% 173 6%low
18 Our Lady's Catholic Primary School Above 73% 67% +6.5 20% 13% 13% 88 16%
19 Meadowbank Primary School Above 69% 63% +6.3 17% 29% 5% 175 7%low
20 St Thomas' Church of England Primary School Heaton Chapel Above 74% 68% +5.6 11% 16% 20% 257 8%low
21 All Saints Church of England Primary School Marple As expected 70% 65% +4.7 17% 17% 0% 93 2%
22 Mellor Primary School As expected 71% 67% +4.3 4% 25% 4% 86 19%
23 Broadstone Hall Primary School As expected 65% 61% +4.2 25% 29% 5% 209 14%below average
24 St Mary's Catholic Voluntary Academy As expected 72% 68% +4.0 13% 13% 10% 90 6%
25 Hursthead Junior School As expected 74% 71% +3.5 4% 11% 9% 272 11%below average
26 Moss Hey Primary School As expected 75% 72% +3.5 0% 9% 3% 95 14%
27 Pownall Green Primary School As expected 71% 69% +1.8 3% 17% 8% 179 14%below average
28 St Ambrose Catholic Primary School As expected 54% 53% +1.2 61% 32% 23% 80 15%above average
29 Westmorland Primary School As expected 58% 57% +0.8 62% 11% 16% 165 12%below average
30 Dial Park Primary School As expected 53% 52% +0.6 45% 43% 2% 132 19%
31 Lane End Primary School As expected 68% 67% +0.6 6% 19% 0% 92 10%
32 Outwood Primary School As expected 66% 66% +0.0 38% 6% 41% 95 30%
33 St Mary's Church of England Primary School As expected 59% 59% −0.2 46% 15% 4% 83 15%
34 North Cheshire Jewish Primary School As expected 68% 69% −0.5 16% 12% 24% 81 14%below average
35 Hazel Grove Primary School As expected 57% 59% −1.6 54% 20% 39% 163 14%
36 Vale View Primary School As expected 54% 56% −1.6 50% 32% 25% 182 17%above average
37 Moorfield Primary School As expected 62% 64% −2.1 20% 21% 7% 186 10%below average
38 Bridge Hall Primary School As expected 40% 42% −2.3 79% 54% 11% 90 10%below average
39 Banks Lane Junior School As expected 64% 67% −2.9 16% 12% 2% 264 8%low
40 Fairway Primary School As expected 60% 64% −4.1 17% 23% 3% 90 10%
41 Etchells Primary School Below 64% 69% −5.0 21% 11% 44% 188 13%below average
42 St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School Below 56% 61% −5.3 41% 14% 14% 89 8%low
43 Whitehill Primary School Below 50% 57% −7.4 57% 26% 52% 80 10%below average
44 Cale Green Primary School Below 55% 63% −7.5 42% 16% 40% 132 3%low
45 St Elisabeth's Church of England Primary Below 55% 63% −7.5 31% 17% 7% 102 18%above average
46 St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy Below 49% 57% −7.5 47% 29% 18% 63 34%
47 Cheadle Heath Primary School Below 55% 63% −8.1 35% 16% 25% 155 9%low
48 Prospect Vale Primary School Below 62% 70% −8.1 13% 13% 39% 94 10%below average
49 St Paul's Church of England Primary School Brinnington Below 44% 52% −8.4 56% 34% 8% 146 3%low
50 Rose Hill Primary School Below 56% 65% −8.7 23% 15% 5% 233 18%above average
51 Cheadle Village Primary School Below 55% 64% −8.9 38% 10% 26% 120 9%low
52 St George's Church of England Primary School Below 54% 63% −9.0 36% 16% 27% 151 25%high
53 Dane Bank Primary School Below 60% 69% −9.1 6% 16% 13% 94 6%low
54 Brookside Primary School Below 47% 56% −9.3 29% 42% 0% 79 0%
55 Arden Primary School Below 51% 61% −10.4 35% 17% 5% 192 6%low
56 St Matthew's Church of England Primary School Well below 41% 54% −12.5 67% 22% 19% 81 12%
57 All Saints Church of England Primary School Stockport Well below 41% 54% −13.1 64% 21% 14% 83 30%high
58 Woodley Primary School Well below 51% 64% −13.1 20% 20% 3% 171 7%low
59 St Simon's Catholic Primary School Well below 53% 66% −13.2 21% 21% 39% 79 19%
60 Abingdon Primary School Well below 39% 53% −13.6 48% 41% 7% 144 34%high
61 Mersey Vale Primary School Well below 55% 69% −14.2 25% 13% 67% 83 0%low
62 St Thomas' Church of England Primary School Stockport Well below 38% 53% −14.7 80% 13% 20% 56 14%below average
63 Greave Primary School Well below 52% 67% −15.0 15% 13% 3% 126 8%low
64 Bredbury St. Marks CofE Primary School Well below 38% 53% −15.3 53% 33% 7% 56 15%
65 Lark Hill Primary School Well below 39% 55% −15.5 55% 32% 26% 80 12%
66 Ladybridge Primary School Well below 39% 58% −18.7 43% 39% 54% 87 14%
67 Warren Wood Primary School Well below 43% 66% −22.7 15% 18% 2% 170 7%low
68 Vernon Park Primary School Well below 38% 63% −24.6 24% 24% 9% 120 13%below average

Results are the average of the last three Year 6 groups, which is steadier than a single year. Pupil percentages are for the latest Year 6. Disadvantaged: eligible for free school meals at any point in the last six years, or looked after by the council. SEN: special educational needs (SEN support or an EHC plan). EAL: English as an additional language.

How this works

We looked at every comparable state primary and junior school in England (14,315 schools) to see how SATs results usually change with the make-up of a year group. On average:

  • For every 10 more disadvantaged pupils in every 100, the share meeting the expected standard is about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with SEN in every 100, it's about 2.4 percentage points lower.
  • For every 10 more pupils with English as an additional language in every 100, it's about 0.7 percentage points higher. Pupils learning English often catch up quickly.

From those, each school gets an expected result for its own pupils, which we compare with its actual result. Primary year groups are small – in a class of 30, one child moves the percentage by more than 3 points – so we use the three-year average and allow for each school's own pupil numbers: a small school needs a bigger gap before we call it above or below what you'd expect.

What we found: schools where teachers stay

We put every primary and junior school's result-against-expected next to its teacher turnover – the share of its teachers who moved to another school or left state schools each year, averaged over three years (DfE school workforce census). Across 8,274 schools in England, split into four equal groups by turnover:

Teacher turnoverTypical turnoverResults vs expectedDid better than expected
Lowest turnover 7% a year +1.8 pts 40%
Lower-middle 12% a year +1.2 pts 37%
Upper-middle 17% a year +0.7 pts 36%
Highest turnover 26% a year −1.2 pts 32%

The pattern is the same as for secondary schools but weaker, and most of the difference is in the quarter of schools where teachers leave most often (−1.2 percentage points, against +1.8 for the lowest-turnover quarter). Primary staffs are small and SATs results move around from year to year, which blurs the picture.

A link isn't proof that one causes the other: losing teachers may hold results back, and a school that's struggling for other reasons (leadership, for example) may also lose more teachers. Nationally, turnover is fairly steady from year to year and teachers who move are replaced – but between schools it varies a lot, from under one teacher in ten a year to more than one in five. The green rings on the chart mark the lowest-turnover quarter.

What it can't tell you

  • These three things explain only about 18% of the differences between schools. Much of what makes a school stronger or weaker, and much about its pupils, isn't captured by any published figure.
  • Even averaged over three years, small schools' results move around a lot, so treat close calls as roughly equal.
  • It isn't an excuse for lower results. It shows how a school does compared with schools teaching similar pupils, so you can compare more fairly.
  • We deliberately don't adjust for attendance or exclusions: those are partly down to the school itself.

Source: Department for Education, Key Stage 2 performance data (2024/25). Calculated by The School Companion.